Quarta-feira, Dezembro 3, 2025
spot_imgspot_img

Top 5 da Semana

spot_img

Related Posts

Nápoles celebra título italiano pela quarta vez com vitória sobre Cagliari

O escocês Scott McTominay, aos 42 minutos, e o belga Romelu Lukaku, aos 51, marcaram os golos que garantiram a vitória da equipa de Antonio Conte. Este triunfo permitiu-lhe terminar a competição com mais um ponto do que o vice-campeão, o Inter de Milão, que venceu 2-0 em casa do Como na época 2023/24.

No palmarés, o Nápoles igualou o feito de 2022/23 e os dois títulos conquistados na era de Diego Maradona (1986/87 e 1989/90), solidificando-se no oitavo lugar do ranking liderado pela Juventus, que detém 36 títulos.

Quanto a Antonio Conte, conquistou o campeonato como treinador pelo terceiro clube diferente, após ter triunfado com a Juventus (2011/12, 2012/13 e 2013/14) e o Inter de Milão (2020/21). No meio destas conquistas, também venceu a Premier League ao comando do Chelsea (2016/17).

Artigo anterior
log4net worked while NLog didn’t.

It appears that NLog uses X-NewRelic-ID instead of just NewRelic-ID, which is documented in the agent spec. Could we document this in the README? Are there any other nuances I missed?

username_1: @username_0 thank you for pointing this out. I will make sure we get this documented. No other nuances come to mind, but I will double check on that. username_1: @username_0 I think you meant to link to differently. The code for NLog shows [`NewRelic-ID`](https://github.com/newrelic/newrelic-logenricher-dotnet/blob/1f4c278de219695709d7ca1509001599604df40f/src/NewRelic.LogEnrichers.NLog/NLogExtensions.cs#L20). I will assume you meant `X-NewRelic-ID`. username_1: Updated README with #27 mentioning the header values. Docs issue created at https://github.com/newrelic/docs-website/issues/2406.">

TrTitle: Document NLog header username_0: I just spent a bunch of time trying to figure out why log4net worked while NLog didn’t.

It appears that NLog uses X-NewRelic-ID instead of just NewRelic-ID, which is documented in the agent spec. Could we document this in the README? Are there any other nuances I missed?

username_1: @username_0 thank you for pointing this out. I will make sure we get this documented. No other nuances come to mind, but I will double check on that. username_1: @username_0 I think you meant to link to differently. The code for NLog shows [`NewRelic-ID`](https://github.com/newrelic/newrelic-logenricher-dotnet/blob/1f4c278de219695709d7ca1509001599604df40f/src/NewRelic.LogEnrichers.NLog/NLogExtensions.cs#L20). I will assume you meant `X-NewRelic-ID`. username_1: Updated README with #27 mentioning the header values. Docs issue created at https://github.com/newrelic/docs-website/issues/2406.
Próximo artigo

DEIXE UMA RESPOSTA

Por favor digite seu comentário!
Por favor, digite seu nome aqui

Popular Articles